Pros Quick acceleration and impressively smooth power delivery Great-sounding Mark Levinson audio system Ultra Luxury trim brings first-class accommodations to rear passengers
Cons Big and top-heavy feel around turns Excessively floaty ride like a 1970s Cadillac Some driver aids can be overly intrusive Not as much cargo space as some rival SUVs
Pros Broad range of available trims, refined twin-turbo V-6 powertrain, more deluxe interior than outgoing model.
Cons Third row not standard equipment, F Sport model has a rough ride, not as rich looking as a Range Rover.
The 2019 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque still bristles with energetic looks and turbo-4 power, but more refinement and more back-seat room are overdue.
Pros Stunning exterior shape Better powertrain Power bump on top trims One of the few SUV convertibles on the road...
Cons for good reason Not all that practical Aged structure Cramped rear seat
The 2019 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque ranked #4 in Luxury Subcompact SUVs. Currently the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a score of 7.8 out of 10 which is based on our evaluation of 45 pieces of research and data elements using various sources.
Pros Sophisticated cabin Robust engines Excellent off-road abilities Athletic handling
Cons Unrefined transmission Below-average fuel economy Small cargo area in convertible models Pricier than competitors
Refreshed touchscreen interface.Subcompact luxury crossovers have grown in popularity over the last few years in part due to their relatively low cost. While many vehicles in this class are similarly priced, the 2019 Land Rover Range Rover bucks convention and costs almost as much as larger compact crossovers. Still, the Evoque's substantial list of standard features and superior off-road performance could make it worth the financial stretch for the right buyer.
PROS Striking exterior and interior design Available convertible variant is the only one of its kind Fun to drive
CONS Limited visibility, especially for the convertible Not a lot of backseat space Premium pricing compared to subcompact competitors
